By Andrew Klein 

Look around at the houses built in your average Australian suburb today. Then, look at those that have stood for a century, their double-brick walls still straight and true. The difference is not merely one of style or age; it is the physical manifestation of a profound shift in our civilizational psychology. We have transitioned from a culture that built legacies to one that builds liabilities, from a society that valued permanence to an economy that thrives on planned obsolescence. This is not an accident of architecture; it is the direct consequence of a “forever war” mentality that has infected every aspect of our lives, from our foreign policy to our family homes.

From Legacy to Liability: The Architectural Imprint of a Changing Mindset

The solid double-brick villas and stone cottages built before the World Wars were products of a different ethos. They were conceived in a context—however imperfect—that allowed for long-term thinking. A builder’s reputation was tied to the longevity of his work. A home was an intergenerational asset, a piece of a family’s permanent story in the landscape.

This began to change profoundly after the World Wars. The massive demand for rapid reconstruction, coupled with the industrialisation of building materials, ushered in a new paradigm. The American model of timber-frame construction with brick or timber veneer became dominant. This method is not inherently bad, but its adoption was driven by speed and cost-cutting, not durability.

The modern spec-home is the ultimate expression of the short-term, extractive model. The “bones of the house are timber and it’s clad up to the roof line with brick,” as noted. This creates a fundamental weakness. The structure is vulnerable to shifting soils, moisture, and fire in a way that solid masonry is not. Builders have become speculators rather than tradesmen, their profit maximised by building fast and cheap, not by building well. The result is a cycle of debt and insecurity for the homeowner, who faces a constant stream of expensive maintenance for a product designed for a 30-year life, not a 100-year one.

The Vicious Cycle: How Our Homes Trap Us in the Very System That Fails Us

This shift in building philosophy locks us into a destructive economic and social cycle:

1. The Shoddy Product: A house is built with inferior materials and methods to maximise builder profit.

2. The Hidden Cost: The new homeowner soon discovers the need for constant, costly repairs—fixing rising damp, restumping shifting foundations, replacing failing cladding.

3. The Eroding Asset: As pointed out, over time, the house itself becomes worthless. Its value is purely in the land it sits on. The structure is a depreciating asset, a future demolition cost.

4. The Social Burden: Councils continue to rate and tax the property based on “value,” while the resident pours money into a sinking ship. The community is left with a stock of low-quality housing that becomes a burden for future generations.

This cycle is a perfect metaphor for the broader economy: a system that extracts maximum value upfront and externalises the long-term costs onto individuals and society.

The Root Cause: The War Mindset and the Death of Long-Term Thinking

This degradation of quality is not confined to housing. It is a symptom of a society operating on a perpetual war footing, whether the enemy is a foreign nation, a political opponent, or simply the quarterly financial report.

A society in a state of conflict, real or perceived, operates on a brutal, short-term logic. Let us compare the two mindsets:

The Wartime or Extractive Mindset is defined by a short-term time horizon, where the core value is expediency. It views resources as things to be extracted and consumed, driven by the emotions of fear and greed. This results in a culture of conspicuous consumption and a “throw-away” society. A perfect example is the fast-fashion jacket worn twice and discarded.

In stark contrast, The Peaceful or Legacy Mindset operates on a long-term time horizon, valuing quality and sustainability above all. It views resources as things to be nurtured and stewarded, driven by security and compassion. This fosters a culture of craftsmanship and an “heirloom” society. The hand-stitched kimono passed down for generations is its emblem.

The modern housing market is a tragic departure from the legacy mindset. The pre-World War I solid brick house, built to last for centuries, was a product of stability and a belief in the future. The post-World War II brick veneer on a timber frame, with its planned limited lifespan, is the product of a system geared for rapid turnover and immediate profit, echoing the disposable logic of the battlefield.

The Way Forward: Rebuilding a Culture of Permanence

The solution is not simply to mandate double-brick construction. It is to change the underlying economic and psychological drivers. We must consciously reject the wartime mentality that tells us everything—from our products to our planet to our principles—is expendable.

We must champion:

· Regulations that Reward Quality: Building codes should incentivise durability, energy efficiency, and low maintenance, not just minimum safety standards.

· An Economic Shift: We need to move from an economy based on relentless consumption to one based on stewardship, repair, and the creation of lasting value.

· A Return to Craft: We must restore the status of the tradesperson who takes pride in work that will outlive them.

Our homes are our most personal territory. When they are built to fail, it is a constant, quiet message that nothing is built to last, that the future is not worth investing in, and that we are merely temporary occupants in a disposable world. By demanding better—by building homes that are legacies, not liabilities—we do more than secure a roof over our heads. We lay the foundation for a future worthy of the name.