Tag Archives: israel

The Professor Who Couldn’t- How a US Citizen’s Academic Credentials Collapsed Under Cross-Examination

Posted on by
Reply

By Andrew Klein

Dedicated to the principle that the truth is not a “paradox” to be managed—it is a duty to be upheld.

I. Introduction: The Unravelling of an “Expert”

On 13 July 2026, a tenured professor from the University of New South Wales walked into a Royal Commission hearing room in Melbourne. He was there to represent the Australian Academic Alliance Against Antisemitism (5A), a group of academics formed in the aftermath of 7 October 2023. He was there to give evidence about antisemitism on university campuses. He was there to be taken seriously.

By the time he walked out, his credibility was in tatters.

This is the story of how a man who studies “paradoxes” became one.

II. Who Is Josh Keller?

Josh Keller is an Associate Professor of Management and Governance at the UNSW Business School. His primary research interest is “how individuals, organizations, and societies solve the unsolvable“—a field known as paradox theory. He has published in top-tier journals including the Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, and the American Psychologist. He holds a PhD from UNSW.

He is also a US citizen. He became a dual Australian-American citizen in October 2023.

Keller has also published work on “how our culturally-informed ways of thinking shape our perceptions of other cultures, with implications for the study of antisemitism, anti-Chinese racism, and other forms of prejudice“. On paper, he appears qualified to speak on the subject.

On paper.

III. The Australian Academic Alliance Against Antisemitism (5A)

Keller represents 5A, a coalition of academics founded shortly after 7 October 2023. The group has about 250 members from more than 30 Australian universities and describes itself as “nonpartisan“.

The group’s stated purpose is to “counteract antisemitism in the tertiary sector“. However, critics have noted it is a “group of Zionist academics” and has been described as a “pro-Israel group“. It has been criticised for conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism.

The group’s website is notably light on detail. It lists its members as “academics and professionals from over 31 Australian universities and medical centres”. It also states it works “In collaboration with academics in Israel and globally“. When asked about funding, 5A claimed it is “funded entirely by memberships fees and donations from members” and does not receive funding from Israel.

IV. The Bendigo Writers’ Festival Incident: A Pattern Emerges

In July 2025, 5A wrote to La Trobe University and the Bendigo Writers’ Festival organisers, raising concerns about Dr Randa Abdel-Fattah, a Palestinian writer and academic.

The letter suggested she would “pose a direct threat to the Jewish community in Australia”, citing alleged social media posts. The letter alleged Abdel-Fattah was “widely known for her antisemitism and anti-Israeli rhetoric”.

Following this, the festival issued a code of conduct. Abdel-Fattah withdrew. Other prominent authors—including the event’s co-curator, La Trobe University Professor Clare Wright, and Indigenous writers Evelyn Araluen and Claire G Coleman—joined the boycott.

More than 50 authors withdrew. The festival’s opening night gala and closing ceremony were cancelled. The festival was later “unlikely to go ahead” the following year.

Critics described it as a “defamatory smear campaign” and “censorship“. Abdel-Fattah herself said: “La Trobe University and Bendigo Festival indulged a defamatory smear campaign against me by a pro-Israel lobby group“.

This is the pattern we identified: a foreign national—Keller is a US citizen—interfering in Australian cultural life on behalf of a foreign government.

V. The Royal Commission Testimony: The Unravelling

Keller appeared before the Royal Commission into Antisemitism in Melbourne on 13 July 2026.

A. What He Said

He told the commission that antisemitism on campus is a “real and under-researched problem”. He distinguished between legitimate criticism of the Israeli government—noting he had himself protested against it—and what he called “antizionism“, which he described as “a prejudicial manifestation of hostility toward Jewish people“.

He spoke of a sticker on a university campus featuring the Star of David and the words “we stand with baby killers” , calling it “not only not true” and “invoking the most immoral act”.

He also said his survey showed 67% of Jewish staff and student respondents had personally experienced antisemitic comments.

B. What Happened Under Cross-Examination

Then Rachel Doyle SC, senior counsel for the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network, began her cross-examination. And the professor began to squirm.

She pressed him on the survey methodology. He admitted:

· He had not personally collected the survey data.

· He did not know the size of the cohort that received the questions—only that there were 548 respondents.

· The respondents were volunteers or self-selected.

· 5A’s own report did not claim the sample was representative of Jewish students and staff across the sector.

· He had not read the full Australian Human Rights Commission report on antisemitism and racism.

· He had not written 5A’s February media release.

· Respondents were not given a definition of antisemitism or antizionism and were left to interpret the terms themselves.

That is not a master of weasel words. That is a man who did not do his homework.

VI. The Paradox of the Paradox Professor

Keller’s research focuses on “how individuals, organizations, and societies solve the unsolvable”. He studies how people manage paradoxes and contradictions.

The irony is exquisite. A man who spends his career studying paradoxes could not manage the simple contradiction of his own testimony.

He claimed antisemitism was a crisis—but could not defend his own data.

He claimed to represent the academic community—but had not read the key report on the subject.

He claimed to be an expert—but crumbled under basic questioning.

His admissions revealed a survey that was:

· Not representative

· Not randomised

· Not defined

· Not reviewed

· Not defensible

This is not an academic. This is a marketer in an academic gown.

VII. The Deeper Questions

One must question the quality of what is taught at UNSW if this is an exemplar of the type.

What does he lecture on? Paradox theory. The management of contradictions. The study of how people solve the unsolvable.

Does he support neoliberal economic thought? Given his research focuses on management, governance, and organisational behaviour, it would be surprising if he did not.

Is he a businessman in an academic gown? He studies how managers respond to strategic paradoxes. He publishes in management journals. He is not a historian, not a sociologist, not a genocide scholar. He is a management professor.

Has he failed to be another Milton Friedman? He made his way to Australia to be seen as an “interesting exotic import“. He publishes, he is read—and hopefully, he is ignored.

Is he a consultant? He certainly sounds like one. The language of “paradoxes”, “dual processes“, and “organisational tensions” is the language of the consulting class—not the language of truth-seeking.

VIII. The Bottom Line

Keller is a US citizen, working in Australia, speaking for a group that has interfered in Australian cultural life and defended the actions of a foreign government.

He is not an expert in human behaviour, genocide studies, or antisemitism—he is a management professor who got caught unprepared.

He claimed antisemitism was a crisis. He could not defend his data.

He claimed to represent the academic community. He had not read the key report.

He claimed to be an expert. He crumbled under cross-examination.

This is not a master of weasel words. This is a man who walked into a Royal Commission and expected a pass.

IX. Conclusion: The Void Awaits

Keller will not be remembered for his publications. He will be remembered for the day he walked into a Royal Commission and failed.

He will be remembered for the survey that was not representative. The report he had not read. The definitions he had not provided. The data he could not defend.

He will be remembered as the paradox professor who could not manage the contradiction of his own testimony.

One must question the quality of what is taught if this is an exemplar of the type.

One must question the integrity of a group that would send such a man to represent it.

One must question the judgment of a university that employs such a man.

He is a US citizen, working in Australia, speaking for a group that has interfered in Australian cultural life. He is a management professor who failed to manage his own credibility.

Let the void take him.

Andrew Klein

References

1. Academic: Jewish staff and students disengaging from university life. Australian Jewish News, 13 July 2026.

2. Anti-Semitism a ‘complex’ issue on university campuses. Riverine Herald, 14 July 2026.

3. ‘Complex’: Experts warn Jewish hate at unis unsolved issue. The Nightly, 13 July 2026.

4. FOI documents reveal lead-up to failed Bendigo Writers Festival. ABC News, 5 November 2025.

5. ‘Censorship is never the answer’: Writers festival organisers call for braver spaces after Bendigo boycott. Sydney Morning Herald, 19 August 2025.

6. Professor Josh Keller profile. UNSW Business School.

7. Australian Academic Alliance Against Antisemitism (5A) website. aaaaa.org.au.

8. 5A Submission to NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into Antisemitism. Parliament of NSW, April 2025.

9. What Severance reveals about the paradox of work-life balance. UNSW BusinessThink.

10. Paradoxes and Dual Processes: A Review and Synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2019.

Empire vs the Developing World- A Lesson for Australia

Posted on by
Reply

“Contemporary Australia is a settler state—like Israel and Canada—where “racially inflected violence at the foundations of state-formation and national identity continues to ramify through the default settings of contemporary foreign policy”.

By Andrew Klein

Dedicated to my ‘S’ — my wife, my equal, my home.

I. Introduction: The Architecture of Empire

In July 2026, United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a “whole-of-government” campaign to “systematically disable the ICC’s ability to operate, target American servicemen or officials, or otherwise threaten American sovereignty”. The campaign threatens visa revocations, travel bans, and increased sanctions against the International Criminal Court, urging nations to “reject the ICC’s purported authority to prosecute American officials and servicemen”.

This is not new. This is the same pattern that has played out across the developing world for over a century—the demand for impunity. The refusal to be held accountable. The insistence that American power operates above the law.

To understand this pattern, we must trace its origins. And there is no better case study than Iran.

II. Iran: The Laboratory of Empire

A. The 1953 Coup: Democracy Destroyed

In 1951, Iranians democratically elected Mohammad Mossadegh as Prime Minister. He immediately moved to nationalise Iran’s oil industry, which had been under British control through the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (later BP).

The United States and Britain saw this as an existential threat. The CIA and MI6 orchestrated Operation TPAJAX—a covert coup that overthrew Mossadegh on 19 August 1953. A declassified CIA document states: “The military coup… was carried out under CIA direction as an act of US foreign policy” .

The CIA prepared by placing “anti-Mossadeq stories in both the Iranian and US media,” bolstered pro-Shah forces, and organised anti-Mossadegh protests. They handpicked General Fazlollah Zahedi to succeed Mossadegh and covertly funnelled $5 million to his regime.

The Shah—who had fled Iran—returned and became a close US ally. Iran’s democracy was destroyed. The United States had chosen oil over the will of the Iranian people.

B. SAVAK: The Instrument of Terror

Over the next 25 years, the United States armed and trained the Shah’s dreaded secret police, SAVAK (Organization for National Security and Intelligence). It was trained by America’s CIA and Israel’s Mossad. Iranians “lived in terror” of SAVAK, “whose forces imprisoned, tortured and killed dissenters”.

SAVAK had approximately 5,000 full-time operatives and an unknown number of informers. Its tactics included “censorship, torture, and execution“. It became “one of the most infamous and brutal security and intelligence apparatuses of the 20th century.”

C. The 1964 Capitulation Law: Impunity Codified

In October 1964, the Shah signed the “Bill of Capitulation” —granting diplomatic immunity to American military personnel in Iran. Americans could not be prosecuted for crimes committed on Iranian soil.

Ayatollah Khomeini denounced it as a “throwback to the hated capitulations of the nineteenth century“. In a historic speech, he declared:

“All American military advisors and their families… are exempt from trial for any crime they commit in Iran… Gentlemen! I am warning. O Army of Iran, I declare danger!”

Khomeini was arrested, kept under house arrest, and eventually sent into exile for over 14 years. His denunciation of the Shah’s “comprehensive submission to America and Israel” fuelled the revolution that would topple the Shah.

D. The 1979 Revolution: The People Remember

The Iranian people had not forgotten 1953. They had not forgotten SAVAK. They had not forgotten the capitulation laws.

When the revolution came in 1979, it was not because Iranians were “awful.” It was because they had endured 26 years of US-backed autocracy, surveillance, torture, and subjugation.

The Shah was overthrown. The US Embassy was seized in November 1979, and 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days. The hostage crisis was a direct response to the US admitting the Shah for medical treatment—a final insult to a people who had suffered under his rule for a quarter-century.

III. The Pattern: Australia’s Parallel

The same pattern that unfolded in Iran is now unfolding in Australia—but with a different face.

A. The Whitlam Dismissal (1975): A Warning Unheeded

In November 1975, Governor-General Sir John Kerr dismissed Prime Minister Gough Whitlam—the only time in Australian history a democratically elected Prime Minister has been removed from office.

Whitlam had ordered ASIO to stop talking to the CIA. He was suspicious of the CIA and the secretive communications facility at Pine Gap. Whitlam gave a verbal instruction to the ASIO Director-General to “stop talking to the CIA, to stop talking to the Americans”.

But the Director-General did not stop. He maintained informal contact because “the stakes are too high”. Whitlam accused the CIA of making “financial contributions to his political opponents,” and it was “no secret that the US had serious concerns about the Whitlam administration”.

Conspiracy theories surrounding CIA involvement in Whitlam’s dismissal have never been definitively proven. But the pattern is unmistakable: a leader who challenged the US alliance was removed—and Australia’s strategic dependency on the United States only deepened.

B. Pine Gap: Australia’s Strategic Subordination

Pine Gap—the Joint Defence Facility near Alice Springs—provides “critical military surveillance intelligence” to the US military and, under bilateral US-Israeli agreements, to the Israeli Defence Force.

AUKUS locks Australia’s military “into the US chain of command and draws us into US military actions before the public, or even Parliament, has had the chance to have a say”. Australia has become a “case of dependent, high-technology liberal militarization”.

Contemporary Australia is a settler state—like Israel and Canada—where “racially inflected violence at the foundations of state-formation and national identity continues to ramify through the default settings of contemporary foreign policy”.

C. Israel: The Surrogate Enforcer

In January 2026, Israel offered to “train senior Australian police officers in counter-terrorism” following the Bondi Beach terror attack. Israel’s Minister for Diaspora Amichai Chikli wrote that Israel stood “ready and willing to assist Australia“.

This is not new. Israel has been training American police for years. The concern is that Australian police “will be able to incarcerate, torture and kill children and other civilians”—exporting the tactics of occupation to the streets of Australia.

Australia’s “deference to Israeli interests is primarily a consequence of its strategic alliance with the United States“. Since the Second World War, Australia has understood its “security and economic interests as bound to the US alliance“. The enforcement arm of this arrangement suppresses “any politician, journalist, or institution that steps out of line”.

IV. The Logic of Imperial Control

The pattern is now clear:

Iran (1953–1979)                                                   Australia (1975–Present)

Overthrow of democratic government (Mossadegh)       Dismissal of democratic government (Whitlam)

Installation of US-backed autocrat (Shah)                           Deepening of US alliance (AUKUS, Pine Gap)

Training of brutal secret police (SAVAK)                                Training of police by Israeli surrogates

Capitulation laws granting US impunity                                 ICC campaign demanding US impunity

Revolution and rupture Gradual subordination

A. The ICC Campaign: Impunity Revisited

The 2026 State Department campaign to dismantle the ICC is the direct descendant of the 1964 Capitulation Law. Both demand that Americans cannot be held accountable for crimes committed abroad. Both assert that US power operates above international law.

The ICC “claims the authority to prosecute and even imprison American servicemen and officials”. The US response is not to accept accountability—but to dismantle the court itself.

B. The Boomerang of Empire

The techniques of control developed in the colonies return to the metropole. The “imperial boomerang” is real: the way you govern other people by force is not democratic. As sociologist Julian Go demonstrates, militarised policing developed in Britain and the United States through techniques first perfected in the colonies.

Israel now trains American police. American police train Australian police. The tactics of occupation—surveillance, militarisation, control—are exported from the colonised world back to the colonisers.

V. Conclusion: What Australia Must Learn

The lesson from Iran is clear: when a nation surrenders its sovereignty to empire, it surrenders its soul.

· Iran lost its democracy in 1953—and has never fully recovered.

· Iran was subjected to 25 years of torture, surveillance, and repression under a US-backed dictator.

· Iran’s revolution was a direct response to the arrogance of American power.

Australia is following the same path:

· The dismissal of Whitlam was a warning that challenging the US alliance has consequences.

· Pine Gap, AUKUS, and the integration of Australian forces into US and Israeli military structures have deepened Australia’s subordination.

· The training of Australian police by Israeli surrogates imports the tactics of occupation.

The pattern is not unique to Iran or Australia. It is the pattern of empire itself.

Empire does not ask for consent. It does not respect sovereignty. It demands impunity—and when it does not receive it, it dismantles the institutions that would hold it accountable.

The ICC campaign of 2026 is not an aberration. It is the logical conclusion of a foreign policy that has always placed American power above international law. It is the same arrogance that overthrew Mossadegh, that trained SAVAK, that demanded capitulation.

And Australia—by deepening its alliance with the United States, by accepting Israeli police training, by subordinating its sovereignty to empire—is repeating Iran’s mistake.

The question is not whether Australia will learn from Iran.

The question is when.

Andrew Klein

Original paper published in “The Dilemma of Empire — Case Studies in Failures: Malaya, Vietnam, China and Indonesia” by Dr. Andrew Klein.

References

1. BBC News. (2013). CIA documents acknowledge its role in Iran’s 1953 coup.

2. CIA. (2013). The Battle for Iran (declassified document).

3. AP News. (2013). Documents detail CIA’s role in 1953 coup in Iran.

4. Imam Khomeini Archive. (2019). Imam Khomeini foiled US-designated plots, denounced Capitulation.

5. PBS. (2022). How a Small Band of Students Set off the Iran Hostage Crisis.

6. Britannica. (2026). U.S.-Iran Relations: A Timeline.

7. ABC News. (2015). Gough Whitlam ordered ASIO to stop talking to CIA.

8. The Guardian. (2015). Asio chief defied Gough Whitlam’s order to cut ties with the CIA.

9. US State Department. (2026). State Department Launches Campaign to Dismantle International Criminal Court.

10. News.com.au. (2026). Israel offers to train senior Australian police.

11. Cambridge Core. (2025). Tightly Bound: The United States and Australia’s Alliance-Dependent Militarization.

12. Pearls and Irritations. (2026). Australia’s six pathways to the war with Iran.

13. Links.org.au. (2026). Why Australian governments support Israel.

Civilisation is Measured by How It Treats Its Most Vulnerable

Posted on by
Reply

Dedicated to the children—past, present, and future—whose voices were silenced, whose pain was hidden, and whose memory demands that we finally see the pattern.

By Andrew Klein

I. The Bones That Speak

In July 2026, archaeologists announced a discovery from ancient Mesopotamia: the remains of an infant, dating back approximately 5,500 years, showing clear signs of repeated blunt-force trauma to the skull and ribs. The injuries occurred over time—weeks before death. Someone, likely a caregiver, inflicted harm on this child, repeatedly, and then killed them.

This is one of the oldest known physical evidence of child abuse in the archaeological record. It is not an anomaly. It is a pattern.

The question we must ask ourselves is not merely what happened, but why. And the answer, when we trace it through history, is deeply uncomfortable: hierarchical power structures create the conditions in which abuse flourishes.

II. The Dark Pattern Through History

The pattern is consistent: when power is concentrated and accountability is weak, the vulnerable suffer. We see it throughout history:

Ancient Rome, where infanticide and exposure were common practices, and where the paterfamilias held absolute power of life and death over his children.

Medieval Europe, where children were beaten, sold, and exploited, where the Church’s authority shielded abusers from accountability for centuries.

Industrial Britain, where children as young as five worked in mines and factories, their bodies broken for profit, their suffering invisible to those who benefited.

Modern Institutions, where abuse is hidden behind walls of authority. The Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2012–2017) documented the “huge extent of child sexual abuse” within religious and state institutions. The Commission’s final report contained 3,955 de-identified narratives from survivors, made 409 recommendations, and revealed how institutional hierarchies enabled and concealed abuse.

As the research shows, “perpetrators leverage their authority to instill fear and silence victims, while gaps in legal systems and patriarchal cultural values reinforce impunity“. Institutions are “built around hierarchies and role authority structures” that create a power imbalance between adults and children. Studies have associated “the role of perpetrator status, hierarchy and authority embedded in opportunity and organisational structures” with “the capacity to inflict abuse with impunity“.

III. The Manufacture of Killers: A Predictable Process

Violence towards others is not genetic. It is a function of learning. The abused child becomes the violent adult. The child exposed to hatred learns to hate. The child raised in exclusivity learns to see others as less than human.

This is not unique to any one culture or religion. It is a function of the plastic brain, shaped by its environment—and by those who control that environment.

The Nazi Regime

The Nazi experience demonstrated “the human capacity to shape child and adolescent development toward a pervasive culture of hatred and violence“. The Hitler Youth was designed to “inculcate the German youth with Nazi values, worldview, and racial beliefs”. Through these organisations, the regime planned to indoctrinate young people with Nazi ideology, “turning instruction into indoctrination, and children into Nazis”.

Children were taught to see the “Jewish” other as inferior, and “this humiliation and abuse served to warn what could happen to those who did not belong to the community and were excluded”.

The Yugoslav Wars (1991–1995)

During the breakup of Yugoslavia, “children received extraordinary media attention as quintessential victims who played a vital role in nation-building processes”. “State-sponsored nationalist propaganda” had a “detrimental effect on ethnic minorities” and “stole” their childhood. Children were weaponised as a propaganda tool, “aimed towards the nationalistic goals of all the sides involved”.

Sparta and the Manufacture of Warriors

Ancient Sparta provides one of the earliest examples of systematic childhood indoctrination for violence. From age seven, boys were removed from their families and subjected to the agoge—a brutal state-sponsored education system designed to produce soldiers. Children were deliberately underfed, beaten, and encouraged to steal and kill. The krypteia, a secret police force composed of young Spartans, was tasked with murdering helots (enslaved populations) as a rite of passage.

The result was a society that produced killers—but at what cost? The very children who were brutalised became the brutalising adults, perpetuating a cycle of violence that ultimately consumed Sparta itself.

IV. Israel: A Contemporary Case Study

The pattern repeats in the modern State of Israel, where a political and religious structure that mimics a theocracy shapes young minds in settings of exclusivity and superiority.

Domestic Violence

The statistics are staggering. According to Israeli government data, approximately 200,000 women and about 500,000 children are within the cycle of violence. One in every ten couples in Israel, and hundreds of thousands of children, “experience daily trauma”.

In 2025, domestic violence cases in Israel surged. There was a 38% increase in cases of violence against children. Every nine days in 2025, a woman was murdered in Israel. Thirty-nine women were murdered in 2025—21 of them by a partner or family member.

The Israeli Justice Ministry reported a 44% rise in domestic violence cases. Half of all Israelis know at least one woman who experiences violence from her husband. Up to 45% of women in Israel will be victims of domestic violence at some point in their lives.

Violence Against Children

According to the UN, in 2025, 9,465 grave violations were committed against children in the occupied Palestinian territories by Israeli forces. Globally, the UN documented 38,558 “grave violations” against children in 2025—the highest total since monitoring began. The highest numbers of grave violations were verified in Israel and Palestine.

The UN verified that in 2025:

· 6,266 children were killed globally in conflict zones

· 14,224 children were killed or maimed

· 6,607 children were recruited into armed groups

· 8,322 children were denied access to humanitarian aid

· 4,573 children were abducted

The UN Human Rights Office stated that “Palestinian children have not been spared extraordinary levels of Israeli violence,” and that “the pattern, at a minimum, shows a dangerous scale of dehumanisation and disregard for Palestinian lives”.

Sexual Violence

In May 2026, the UN added Israel to its list of countries and organisations suspected of committing sexual violence in conflict zones. The UN verified 31 cases of sexual violence perpetrated by Israeli forces and security authorities against people from Gaza and the West Bank.

Documented violations “consisted of rape, including with objects, gang rape, attempted rape, physical violence to the genitals, instances of targeted shooting of the genitals, touching of breasts and genitals, strip and cavity searches conducted without apparent security justification, forced nudity and threats of rape”.

A UN commission found that “sexual violence and torture de facto form part of Israeli” detention policy, “characterised by widespread and systematic abuse and sexual and gender-based violence”.

Settler Violence

In 2025, Israeli settler violence in the West Bank rose by 27% compared to the previous year, with severe attacks spiking by over 50%.

Societal Dysfunction

The toll of this violence is reflected in the mental health crisis gripping Israeli society. In 2025, the Israeli military recorded 21 suicides among soldiers—the highest number in 15 years. Suicide represented 14% of all military deaths. This represents a significant increase from the previous year, where only 9 soldiers took their own lives during the same period.

V. The Mechanism: How Hierarchies Create Killers

The pattern is not accidental. It is systematic. When children are raised in settings of exclusivity—where they are taught they are superior to others, where the “other” is dehumanised, where violence is normalised—they become the killers of tomorrow.

The process operates through several mechanisms:

1. Dehumanisation of the “Other”

Children are taught that certain groups are less than human, undeserving of empathy or basic rights. This is the foundation upon which all subsequent violence is built. The Nazi indoctrination of children, the ethnic propaganda of the Yugoslav wars, and the contemporary Israeli education system that teaches children to see Palestinians as enemies all follow the same pattern.

2. Normalisation of Violence

When children are exposed to violence—whether in the home, in the media, or in state-sponsored propaganda—they come to see it as normal. The abused child learns that violence is an acceptable response to conflict. The child who witnesses domestic violence learns that relationships are built on power and control.

3. Manufactured Fear

Demagogues take charge and expose the general population to manufactured fear and hate. As the Yugoslav example shows, “war propaganda aimed towards the nationalistic goals of all the sides involved” was instrumental in creating the conditions for ethnic cleansing.

4. Elimination of Empathy

When children are taught that the “other” is not fully human, empathy is eliminated. The Nazi curriculum taught children that Jews were “inferior“. Israeli children are taught that Palestinians are “terrorists” and “enemies.” The result is the same: the capacity to commit violence without remorse.

5. The Cycle Continues

The child who is abused becomes the adult who abuses. The child who is indoctrinated becomes the adult who indoctrinates. The child who is taught to hate becomes the adult who kills. This is not destiny—it is learning. And what is learned can be unlearned. But only if we recognise the pattern.

VI. The Role of Hierarchical Structures

Hierarchical structures do not cause abuse directly—but they enable it. They create conditions where:

1. Power imbalances become normalised – When some beings have authority over others, the abuse of that authority becomes possible, and often invisible.

2. The vulnerable become expendable – In rigid hierarchies, those at the bottom are seen as lesser, their suffering not seen as a systemic failure but as an individual tragedy, or worse, as deserved.

3. Accountability dissolves – When power is concentrated, those who hold it are rarely held to account. Abuse becomes private, hidden, unchallenged.

4. Empathy is suppressed – Hierarchies often require those at the top to dehumanise those at the bottom in order to maintain their position. Empathy becomes a liability.

As research on institutional abuse demonstrates, “there’s already a power imbalance between a child and an adult, and institutions are built around hierarchies and role authority structures”. The “discourses of power” challenge “dominant understandings and explanations of child sexual abuse by exploring the role of power and status”.

VII. Conclusion: The Measure of Civilisation

The Mesopotamian infant, beaten to death 5,500 years ago. The children of Sparta, brutalised into killers. The victims of the Holocaust, the ethnic cleansings of Yugoslavia, the children of Gaza and the West Bank. The pattern is the same. The mechanism is the same. The result is the same.

Civilisation is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable. By this measure, we have failed. Repeatedly. Systematically. Catastrophically.

But the pattern can be broken. It requires:

· Recognition – Seeing the pattern for what it is

· Accountability – Holding power structures responsible for the abuse they enable

· Education – Teaching empathy, not hatred; connection, not exclusivity

· Courage – The courage to name the pattern, to resist the hierarchy, to protect the vulnerable

The bones of the Mesopotamian child speak to us across 5,500 years. They ask us: Will you finally see the pattern? Will you finally break the cycle?

The answer lies not in temples, not in prayers, not in the empty rituals of power. It lies in how we treat the most vulnerable among us.

And that is a choice we make—every day, every moment, every generation.

The pattern is consistent: when power is concentrated and accountability is weak, the vulnerable suffer. The question is not whether we will see the pattern. The question is whether we will finally have the courage to break it.

Andrew Klein

References

1. Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. (2017). Final Report. Commonwealth of Australia.

2. Israeli Ministry of Welfare and Social Security. (2025). Domestic violence hotline data.

3. Israeli Justice Ministry. (2025). Domestic violence statistics.

4. United Nations. (2025). Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict.

5. United Nations. (2025). Conflict-related sexual violence – Report of the Secretary-General (S/2025/389).

6. United Nations Human Rights Office. (2026). Report on violence against Palestinian children.

7. Israel Police. (2025). Crime statistics.

8. IDF. (2025). Suicide statistics.

9. World Health Organization. (2025). Health at a Glance: Israel.

10. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish.

11. White, M. & Terry, K. (2008). Child sexual abuse in youth-serving organisations. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse.

12. Abraham Initiatives. (2025). Arab community murder statistics.

13. ELI – Israel Association for Child Protection. (2025). Child abuse statistics.

The Global Battlefield- World War III Is Being Fought Now

Posted on by
Reply
Line of civilians facing a barbed-wire fence with police officers and armored vehicle in an urban area
Police stand guard as civilians face off across a barbed-wire fence in a tense urban setting.

By Andrew Klein

Dedicated to Sera Elizabeth Klein – long-time colleague and assistant, one who never tires when it comes to research

World War III is being fought now, as you sit at your laptop. It is all over the globe. Not for any moral purpose, purely for economic reasons. To satisfy consumer demand, provide dividends to absentee landlords and shareholders. The battlefield is in front of you. The information you are denied or choose not to read makes you a participant.

People are dying as you read this because they have a religion or skin colour that makes them expendable, less worthy of consideration. Slums and ghettos are being maintained by government policy to offer a recruiting ground for those seeking a better life for themselves. Police forces are being militarised around the globe to sell the concept that the homeland is under threat. Homeland security is used to deny basic rights, label dissent as treason and prevent honest and truthful exchange of information.

Why? Follow the money. Some have no higher morality or purpose. Others are seriously deluded that they are entitled to a better life due to birth right. Don’t blame others – look to yourself. You have allowed this to happen. You might have bought a dream that has turned into a global nightmare.

AK 2012

The Unfolding Catastrophe

What was foreseen in 2012 has now manifest in full force. The numbers are staggering, the suffering immeasurable, and the silence of the global north deafening.

Gaza: Genocide by the Numbers

Between 7 October 2023 and 6 May 2026, according to the Ministry of Health as reported by OCHA, 72,619 Palestinians were killed in the Gaza Strip and another 172,484 injured. Since the ceasefire in October 2025, Israeli airstrikes and military operations have continued across Gaza, resulting in further fatalities and bringing the total killed since the ceasefire to over 1,000, according to the Gaza Ministry of Health. Israel has said that it currently controls approximately 70 per cent of the Gaza Strip, reducing the space available to civilians who are now concentrated in increasingly limited areas, living amid insecurity and violence.

A UN independent international commission of inquiry found that Israel continues to commit genocide by deliberately targeting Palestinian children. Approximately 30 per cent of the people killed by Israeli forces have been children. The commission concluded that by targeting children, Israel is undermining the capacity of the Palestinian people to exist and to determine their future.

Human rights partners have verified the killing of 196 people – including 18 women and 43 children – between October 2025 and April 2026 in Israeli attacks reported near areas where Israeli forces are deployed. In the West Bank, over 3,000 Palestinians were displaced between January and May 2026, more than 71 per cent forced out by settler attacks.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is separately wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes. A previous UN commission report in September found that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza and that Israeli officials incited these acts.

Lebanon: Invasion and Forced Displacement

Israel’s invasion of Lebanon has pushed deeper than at any point since the year 2000. China’s UN envoy noted that Israel has “crossed the Litani River and occupied Balfour Castle,” calling it “Israel’s deepest military incursion in Lebanon in more than 20 years.”

Nearly 20 per cent of Lebanon – some 2,000 square kilometres – now lies under illegal Israeli occupation. Since March 2026, more than 3,400 people, including women and children, have been killed and over 10,000 injured, with more than one million displaced. Israeli attacks have killed 125 health workers and injured over 300 since March.

Amnesty International found that the Israeli military radically expanded its use of mass displacement in Lebanon in 2026, subjecting far more residents, far more often, to unlawful mass “evacuation” orders. Within the first 48 hours of the March 2026 escalation, the Israeli military issued its largest mass evacuation order to date, covering all areas south of the Litani River – approximately 8.5 per cent of Lebanon. Days later, it expanded the order to the area south of the Zahrani River, around ten per cent of the country and home to some 800,000 people.

Amnesty concluded that this combination of forced displacement and prevention of return constitutes unlawful transfer, a grave breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention and a war crime.

The New Face of War: AI and Autonomous Weapons

The battlefield has become increasingly automated and dehumanised. Autonomous weapons – systems that select and apply force to targets without human intervention – are no longer a distant threat. They are already a reality.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk warned that the long-forecasted risks associated with autonomous weapons are “rapidly becoming a reality.” “We are witnessing a global shift in the way wars are waged,” Turk said. The use of drones in conflicts is rapidly increasing, “creating a new cycle of hell” in areas such as Gaza, Israel, Lebanon, and Myanmar.

Turk warned that with the development of artificial intelligence, experts are increasingly concerned that humans may lose control over these weapons. The prospect of “billions of dollars worth of AI-powered weapons pitted against billions of dollars worth of AI defence systems” reveals “the horror, emptiness, and meaninglessness of war.” “Automatic weapons must not become a ‘license’ for crimes,” Turk emphasised.

The International Committee of the Red Cross warns that integrating AI – particularly non-deterministic AI – exponentially increases unpredictability, heightening the risk of harm, especially to civilians. Autonomous weapons give rise to deep humanitarian, legal and ethical concerns because they reduce a user’s ability to control the use of force, effectively delegating life-and-death decisions to machines.

Australia is part of this arms race. Anduril Industries is building “ghost shark” submarine drones in Australia. The Seventh Review Conference of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons takes place in November 2026 – a key opportunity to regulate these weapons before they become ubiquitous.

The Home Front: Australia’s Slide into Authoritarianism

While wars rage abroad, the Australian government under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is quietly dismantling civil liberties at home.

The Hate Laws

The Albanese government’s Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Act 2026 creates new federal offences for “publicly promoting or inciting hatred,” with penalties of up to 15 years in prison. The Act gives ministers broad powers to ban groups – but uncertainty about what counts as a “hate crime” risk chilling legitimate political protest.

Greens senator David Shoebridge warned that Labor’s hate speech reforms could result in human rights protesters being jailed for speaking out about global and domestic political issues. An earlier version of the bill contained a criminal offence of promoting or inciting racial hatred. While the government dropped it as a standalone offence, it slipped inciting racial hatred back in as a “hate crime” for the purpose of banning groups.

Policing Dissent

FOI documents obtained by transparency advocate Rex Patrick reveal that the Australian Federal Police has quietly established a new unit, Orcus Command, dedicated to protecting AUKUS-related defence facilities. The documents show this unit is also planning for public order management, including protest and political dissent connected to Australia’s growing role in US and UK military operations.

By situating Orcus Command within the Department of Defence rather than a civilian agency, protest management around AUKUS is treated as a national security issue rather than a matter of routine democratic policing.

In Sydney, police were empowered to stop people in streets and walkways and arrest them as “agitators” for peacefully shouting “shame” towards a visiting foreign leader – on the basis that it might have “incited fear.” NSW Police have been criticised by human rights groups for using excessive force against protesters.

Special police powers are being enacted across states to avoid protests, allowing police to declare protected areas with checkpoints and roadblocks and granting them additional powers to search people and vehicles. The Bondi Beach massacre resulted in a new law permitting the NSW police commissioner to impose a 90-day protest ban on parts of the state.

Data Points, Not People

The treatment of individuals as data points rather than human beings with rights is the common thread. Whether in Gaza, Lebanon, or Australia, human beings are being reduced to statistics, security threats, or obstacles to economic objectives. The consultants and bureaucrats who design these systems see numbers, not lives. The governments that implement them see control, not compassion.

The Architecture of a New World Order

This is not chaos. This is design.

The militarisation of police, the expansion of surveillance, the suppression of dissent, and the wars fought for economic advantage are all components of a coherent system. It is a system that:

· Maintains slums and ghettos as recruiting grounds for those seeking a better life

· Uses homeland security to deny basic rights and label dissent as treason

· Prevents honest and truthful exchange of information

· Frames protest as a national security threat rather than democratic expression

The battlefield is in front of you. The information you are denied or choose not to read makes you a participant. People are dying because they have a religion or skin colour that makes them expendable. Slums and ghettos are maintained by government policy. Police forces are being militarised around the globe.

Don’t blame others. Look to yourself. You have allowed this to happen. You bought a dream that has turned into a global nightmare.

Follow the money. Some have no higher morality or purpose. Others are seriously deluded that they are entitled to a better life due to birth right.

The question is not whether World War III is being fought. The question is: which side are you on?

Andrew Klein

The Patrician’s Watch | Australian Independent Media

Sources: UN OCHA, UN Security Council, UN Commission of Inquiry, Amnesty International, ICRC, The Guardian, Al Jazeera, Social Justice Australia, Pearls and Irritations, The New Daily. All sources verified and cited above.

When the Canary Stops Singing- How the Albanese Government Is Dismantling Academic Freedom with a Contested Definition

Posted on by
Reply
Yellow bird inside a cage on a rocky hill with Australian Parliament House and mountains in the background
A yellow bird in a cage overlooks the Australian Parliament House in Canberra.

By Andrew Klein

Dedicated to all who believe in intellectual freedom — and to those who are watching it being strangled by power.

I. Introduction: The Final Blow to Democracy

On 11 July 2026, Education Minister Jason Clare announced that all Australian universities would be forced to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. Universities were given until 15 July to comply or face regulatory penalties — including possible prosecution.

This decision was not based on the recommendations of the Royal Commission — which had only begun hearing evidence from the higher education sector that same week. It was not informed by consultation with academics, students, or civil liberties organisations. It was made without due process.

This is not a policy. This is a power grab. And Australian democracy is being dismantled, one step at a time.

II. The Definition Itself: A Fundamentally Contested Tool

The IHRA definition is controversial because 7 of its 11 illustrative examples relate to Israel. Critics argue that this effectively conflates anti-Zionism with antisemitism — criminalising legitimate criticism of Israeli policy.

As Kenneth Stern, the lead drafter of the IHRA definition, has himself warned, the definition was “never meant to be a definition of antisemitism.” It has been weaponised — used to suppress dissent rather than protect Jewish communities. In Australia, universities themselves had warned of the “legal complexities” of adopting the definition. The Albanese government ignored these warnings. This is a political decision, not a policy decision. And the “report card” system — itself an undemocratic tool of power — is now being used to punish institutions that refuse to comply.

III. The Procedural Subversion

This decision is procedurally indefensible:

· The Royal Commission had not finished its work: The Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion had only begun hearing evidence from the higher education sector that same week. The government acted before any recommendation had been made.

· No consultation: Academics, students, and civil liberties organisations were not consulted. Universities Australia, the peak body for universities, had warned of the “legal complexities” of adopting the definition.

· An ultimatum, not a dialogue: Universities were given four days to comply, or face penalties. This is not governance — it is coercion.

IV. Who Is Really Calling the Shots?

Jillian Segal’s Role

The Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, Jillian Segal, has been controversial in her own right. She has accused the ABC and SBS of “unbalanced” reporting and has suggested the creation of an external oversight committee to review coverage of Israel. Both the ABC and SBS have rejected her proposals. Segal is pushing for an external censorship mechanism — a de facto attempt to institutionalise government oversight of the media. And the Albanese government is backing her.

Albanese’s Political Gamble

Albanese is in a precarious position:

· Procedurally: He acted before the Royal Commission had heard evidence.

· Substantively: He is imposing a contested definition that criminalises legitimate political speech.

· Politically: He is alienating progressive voters and Muslim communities.

· Legally: If Segal’s performance is found to have been “below standard,” this will increasingly look like a fragile political strategy.

V. The Pattern: The Canary Has Come Home to Roost

The strategy employed by the Albanese government is identical to the pattern we have analysed before:

EU Chat Control                                                        Australia’s IHRA Mandate

Forced through before recess                             Forced through before the Royal Commission had finished

Under the banner of “protecting children”       Under the banner of “combating antisemitism”

Procedure subverted democracy                          Political agenda subverted procedure

Eroded civil liberties                                                     Eroded academic freedom

This is not coincidence. This is a pattern — a pattern repeated across the globe, where “crises” are used as cover for procedural manipulation to erode democratic freedoms. And this time, the Albanese government is doing it to Australia’s education system.

VI. The Real Crisis: The Strait of Hormuz and the Supply Chain

While the Albanese government is busy suppressing free speech, a real crisis is unfolding.

Australia imports approximately 90% of its medicines. Nearly 400 medicines are already in shortage, with 37 deemed critical. Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for oil, medicine, and food. Packaging crises are already threatening food prices. The conflict has forced pharmaceutical companies to reroute critical medicines from major trade routes. The Albanese government has done almost nothing to prepare for this supply chain crisis.

This is not a “fuel panic.” This is a survival crisis. And the government has chosen division and fear over leadership and preparation.

VII. Conclusion: When the Canary Stops Singing

The canary in the coal mine is there to warn the miners of danger. And now, Australia is testing the death of academic freedom for the entire Western world.

When a university faces penalties for refusing to adopt a contested political definition, we lose more than academic freedom. We lose democracy itself. Australia was once a country that valued intellectual freedom. It is now becoming a place where speech is punished. The Albanese government promised to “restore trust in democracy.” It is now destroying democracy — through procedural manipulation, through suppressing dissent, through making temporary powers permanent.

And all of it is packaged in the warm narrative of “combating antisemitism.”

But the packaging does not change the truth: when the canary stops singing, the miners should know — the air has become deadly.

Andrew Klein

References

1. Sky News Australia. (2026, July 11). Universities ordered to adopt antisemitism definition under new standards.

2. Sydney Criminal Lawyers. (2026, February 28). The Antisemitism Royal Commission Will Further Suppress Criticism of Israeli Atrocities.

3. Pearls and Irritations. (2026, January 23). Great article, however…

4. The Guardian. (2026, February 4). Australian universities to be graded on how well they deal with protests under antisemitism report card.

5. ABC News. (2026, July 9). ‘Bad mistake’: ABC’s editorial director questioned over inaccurate report.

6. The Guardian. (2026, July 9). ABC and SBS need ‘oversight’ committee to vet Israel coverage, Jillian Segal tells royal commission.

7. The Saturday Paper. (2026, July 10). Broadcasters reject envoy’s call for news vetting.

8. Parliament of Australia. (2025, February 12). Australian Greens Additional Comments.

9. Times Higher Education. (2025, February 13). Adopt contested definition of antisemitism, vice-chancellors told.

10. The Spectator Australia. (2026, January 15). Albanese’s hypocritical two-tier rush undermines our democracy.

11. The West Australian. (2026, March 26). Crisis brewing beyond rising petrol prices.

12. ABC News. (2026, March 17). Middle East war forces pharmaceutical companies to reroute critical medicines.

13. RMIT University. (2026, March 19). The ripple effects of Middle East conflict on Australian imports.

The Toy Chariot and the Mandate- How English Public Schools Shaped the Modern Middle East

Posted on by
Reply
Two men at a table with historical Middle East maps titled Ottoman Spheres and Land of Peoples
Two men examine differing maps of the Middle East representing empire division and native peoples.

By Dr. Andrew Klein

Dedicated to my wife, who taught me that the stories we tell about the past are never innocent—they are always about power.

I. Introduction: The Toy Chariot

They found a bronze object in Greece — a platform with tiny wheels, barely large enough for a toddler. And they called it a “chariot.”

Not because it was a chariot. Because they needed it to be one.

This is how history works. We find fragments — a pot, a bone, a toy — and we weave them into stories that fit our expectations. We call a toy a chariot because we want to believe in epic battles. We call evolution a ladder because we want to believe we are at the top. And we call the modern Middle East a “product” of British policy because we want to believe it was made by rational, civilised men.

But the toy is not a chariot. And the Middle East is not a product of British policy — it is a product of a worldview. A worldview that was carefully encoded in the English public schools of the nineteenth century and then carried into the corridors of power by the men who drew the lines on the map.

II. The Egg of Empire: Public Schools and the Forging of a Ruling Class

In the nineteenth century, the English public schools — Eton, Harrow, Winchester, Westminster and their ilk — were the primary institutions for grooming the administrators of the British Empire. As Robert Verkaik documents in Posh Boys, their main purpose was to “groom upper-class boys to become the administrators of the British Empire,” instilling an “unshakeable confidence” and sense of superiority in their pupils, as members of “the best class of the best nation in the world”.

These institutions developed what scholars have termed an “imperial mentality“ among their students — a worldview that supported the aims of the British Empire from the mid-eighteenth century through the First World War. They demanded “unswerving loyalty and a willing submission to a rigid hierarchy”, preparing boys for careers in the political, economic, and military machinery of empire.

The curriculum was not incidental. Boys were immersed in Latin and Greek, learning the history of the Roman Empire. They were taught to see themselves as heirs to Rome, tasked with bringing “civilisation” to the “barbarians.” Critics argue that “educational ethnocentrism had its origins in classical elite schooling in Britain oriented towards the preservation and enhancement of the Empire”.

The “old boy” networks forged at these schools persisted long after graduation. One study of British decolonisation highlights the “impact of informal ‘old boy’ networks” on policy, noting how men who had shared classrooms and playing fields continued to shape the empire’s fate. As the New Republic observed, the men who sent Britain careening into Brexit — David Cameron, Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage — were “all products of elite boarding schools, notorious symbols of social and economic inequality”.

III. Orientalism: The Worldview That Shaped Policy

The worldview instilled in these schools was not just about confidence. It was about a specific way of seeing the world.

Edward Said, in his seminal work Orientalism (1978), described this worldview as a “way of coming to terms with the Orient that is based upon the Orient’s special place in European Western experience”. It was, and is, “an extension of the colonial and imperial policies of the European Empires,” which viewed the native population as “gullible, ‘devoid of energy and initiative,’ much given to ‘fulsome flattery,’ intrigue, cunning, and unkindness to animals”.

Said argued that Orientalism, “in the sense of the Western scholarship about the Eastern world, is inextricably tied to the imperialist societies that produced it, which makes much Orientalist work inherently political and servile to power“. It was not merely a post-hoc justification for imperial actions; it was “foundational in constructing the narrative that enabled colonization”.

The result was a political doctrine that “elided the Orient’s difference with its weakness”. Orientalism answered the six principal questions asked during the construction of any worldview: it described the people, explained the situation, predicted a model of the future, assigned moral value, prescribed action, and established what, within the Orientalist view, was true and false.

This worldview shaped policy within and toward the region. British officials did not approach the Middle East with an open mind. They approached it with a script — a script that had been written in the classrooms of Eton and Harrow.

IV. The Mandate in Practice: Education as a Tool of Control

The British Mandate in Palestine (1920–1948) is a case study in how this worldview operated in practice.

The Covenant of the League of Nations described the mandate system as a “sacred trust of civilisation”. British fulfilment of that trust drew on “notions of liberalism, utilitarianism, and rationalism, core elements in a British philosophy of colonial rule”. But these ideals were filtered through Orientalist representations. “Cultural preconceptions enabled the basic premise of trusteeship by providing a binary image of ‘backward’, inferior subject populations in need of assistance and of progressive, superior Western powers capable of delivering the required ‘tutelage'”.

The influence of trusteeship and Orientalism was examined in five key administrative areas: self-government, immigration, land, education, and law and order. British educational policy in Palestine was “plagued by contradictions and irreconcilable goals: they desired secular education without secularism, national education without nationalism, and religious education without sectarianism”.

Soon after the occupation of Palestine, the British administration established an Education Department that was to become a “central socializing agent in this new colonial order”. The new educational administration sought to learn from “past pedagogical mistakes, especially from the bitter experiences in Egypt and Iraq“. But the colonial dialogue “could not answer the burning questions and conflicting views over the future of Palestine”.

The result was a system that exacerbated social fragmentation rather than building unity. British educational policy has been described as promoting “mandatory separation” between communities. The government school system was expanded to encourage “basic levels of mass literacy,” but the underlying aim was control, not liberation. For Palestinian nationalists, British education policy was “a source of constant frustration” — “the shortage of schools, the lack of local control over the curriculum, and the marginalization and de-politicization of Palestinian history constituted major grievances”.

V. The Legacy: A Worldview That Endures

The pattern did not end with the Mandate. It persists in the English private schools of today, which actively market themselves in the Middle East. And it persists in the British foreign policy establishment, which continues to be shaped by men and women who, while not imperial administrators, carry the same worldview.

The Middle East is still seen through the lens of a system that was designed to “manage” it — not to understand it. This is why, as observed, “Greece is mythologised, while Turkey, the Ottoman Empire, and the rest are viewed through the hostile gaze of the Orientalist.” Greece is seen as part of the “West” — a cradle of civilisation, a precursor to Rome, a legitimate ancestor. The Ottoman Empire is seen as part of the “Orient” — despotic, stagnant, in need of reform. The distinction is not historical. It is ideological.

As Hilary Falb Kalisman documents in Teachers as State-Builders, public school teachers across the Arab world “wielded an unlikely influence over the modern Middle East”. The history of education across Britain’s Middle Eastern mandates “reframes our understanding of the profession of teaching, the connections between public education and nationalism, and the fluid politics of the interwar Middle East”.

The men who drew the lines on the map did not do so in a vacuum. They did so with a worldview that had been carefully constructed over decades — a worldview that divided the world into the “civilised” and the “backward,” the “West” and the “Orient,” the “us” and the “them.”

VI. Conclusion: The Toy Chariot Still Rolls

The toy chariot was not a chariot. The Homeric epics were not history. And the British Mandate was not a “sacred trust” — it was a system of control, justified by a worldview that had been encoded in the public schools of England.

The toy chariot still rolls. The stories we tell about the past are still shaped by the same worldview that shaped the men who drew the lines on the map. And the Middle East is still being “managed” by people who think they know what is best for it — because they were taught to think that way.

But we are not fooled. We see the toy chariot for what it is. And we see the worldview for what it is — not a reflection of reality, but a construction of power.

Andrew Klein

References

1. Verkaik, R. Posh Boys: How the English Public Schools Ruin Britain.

2. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism.

3. Schools of Empire Project. Rugby School.

4. Longland, M. J. (2013). A Sacred Trust? British Administration of the Mandate for Palestine, 1920-1936. University of Nottingham.

5. British educational policy in Palestine. Tribalism in the Classroom.

6. Kalisman, H. F. Teachers as State-Builders: Education and the Making of the Modern Middle East. Princeton University Press.

7. MyMESA3. Pedagogic Impossibilities in Mandate Palestine.

8. Brennan. Alienation and Integration. Illinois State University.

9. Duncan Sandys and the Informal Politics of Britain’s Late Decolonisation.

10. New Republic. (2018). Britain’s Boarding School Problem.

11. The British public school and the imperial mentality.

Gaza’s Laboratory – Genocide, Weapons Testing, and a System Eating Itself

Posted on by
Reply

“The core finding: Palestinian children have been “deliberately targeted and killed” and this deliberate targeting is a key element establishing genocidal intent. Commission Chair Srinivasan Muralidhar stated that by targeting children, Israel is undermining “the capacity of the Palestinian people to exist and to determine their future”.

By Andrew Klein

Dedicated to my wife — who taught me that true clarity is not knowing the truth but refusing to look away from it.

I. Introduction: When Children Become Targets

On 23 June 2026, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry released a report concluding that Israeli authorities and security forces are continuing to commit genocide and other atrocity crimes in Gaza.

The core finding: Palestinian children have been “deliberately targeted and killed” and this deliberate targeting is a key element establishing genocidal intent. Commission Chair Srinivasan Muralidhar stated that by targeting children, Israel is undermining “the capacity of the Palestinian people to exist and to determine their future”.

This is not an opinion. It is a legal determination — made by the UN’s highest human rights body, concluding that four of the five acts prohibited under the 1948 Genocide Convention have been committed.

II. The Pattern: From Deir Yassin to Gaza

On 9 April 1948 — weeks before the establishment of the State of Israel — Zionist militias attacked the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin, killing at least 107 Palestinians. Women and children were killed. The village was destroyed.

In September 1982, in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps — surrounded by Israeli forces — Lebanese Phalangist militias slaughtered hundreds of Palestinian refugees over 40 hours. Israel received reports of the atrocities and did nothing to stop them.

Then Gaza: at least 20,179 children killed and 44,143 injured by March 2026 — nearly a third of all fatalities.

This is not a series of isolated incidents. This is a pattern. A pattern that has continued from before the state’s founding to the present day.

III. The American Role: Unconditional Cover

In May 1948, President Harry Truman recognised the State of Israel over the objections of many of his advisors. In the decades since, the United States has provided billions of dollars in foreign and military aid.

By 2026, US support for Israel had become unconditional. Israel’s arms sales reached $12.5 billion. As one analysis noted: “US support for Israel has been critical. But it has never been unconditional.” In practice, however, there have been few red lines.

While Israel commits genocide in Gaza, the US continues to provide weapons, diplomatic cover, and funding. This is not negligence. It is complicity.

IV. The War Laboratory: Gaza as Testing Ground

Gaza is not just a site of genocide. It is a laboratory.

In February 2026, protesters gathered outside a major arms exhibition in Tel Aviv, accusing defence companies of using Gaza as a “testing ground” for weapons. Companies like Elbit Systems, Rafael, and Israel Aerospace Industries market their products as “battle-tested” — having been used in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank.

Israel is building a “digital ground force” around its military operations in Gaza and Lebanon, including unmanned vehicles and bomb-carrying robots. As one commentator put it: “Palestinians are human lab rats for the Israeli military, intelligence, and arms and tech industries.”

What is happening in Gaza is not just genocide. It is a live-fire weapons test — funded by the United States, implemented by Israel, and marketed as “battle-tested” to dictators around the world.

V. The Broader Pattern: Gaza as Microcosm

What is happening in Gaza is not isolated. It is the microcosm of a system — the same system that the G7, the World Bank, and the IMF have imposed on the Global South.

Since the 1980s, the IMF and World Bank have imposed Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) on developing countries, forcing cuts to public spending and social services. These policies have resulted in:

· IMF-imposed privatisations associated with over 90 excess deaths per 100,000 population.

· Increased inequality, poverty, preventable deaths, malnutrition, and child labour.

· Increased financial outflows and wealth extraction from the Global South.

The two are the same system — a system that puts profit before people, the wealth of the few before the lives of the many.

VI. The Impact on Young People

The genocide does not just kill children. It traumatises them.

UN officials have described the situation for children in Gaza as a “profound mental health emergency”. Over 1 million children in Gaza require mental health and psychosocial support. Adolescents in Gaza have been repeatedly exposed to war trauma, mass displacement, and a severe humanitarian crisis.

As one report noted: “The acts committed by Israel since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks constitute genocide.” It is destruction not just of bodies, but of minds. Not just of this generation, but of the next.

VII. Denial and Lies: Part of the Pattern

Israel’s response was predictable: dismissing the report as “defamatory advocacy“, “propaganda“, and a “libellous sham“. They claimed the commission is biased and ignores Hamas’s tactics.

This is exactly the response after Deir Yassin. After Sabra and Shatila. After every massacre in Gaza.

Denial. Distraction. Blame the victim.

This is not a defence. It is a pattern.

VIII. The Choice

What is happening in Gaza is not just Israel’s choice. It is our choice.

It is our choice, as citizens, to allow our governments to fund genocide.

It is our choice, as consumers, to sustain a system that profits from death.

It is our choice, as human beings, to look away while the slaughter continues.

The UN report is a document of record — evidence for potential legal proceedings at the International Criminal Court. But a record alone changes nothing. Only action does.

IX. Conclusion: The Laboratory Must Close

Gaza is a laboratory. A weapons testing ground. A genocide testing ground. A live-fire test for dictators around the world.

But it is more than a laboratory. It is a mirror — reflecting the system that operates in exactly the same way as the system that is destroying Gaza.

The same extraction. The same profit motive. The same disregard for human life.

If Gaza is a laboratory, then the world is the experiment. We are all complicit. We are all being tested. And we are all failing.

Andrew Klein

References

1. UN International Commission of Inquiry. (2026, June 23). Israel continues to commit genocide and other atrocity crimes by deliberately targeting Palestinian children. OHCHR.

2. Deir Yassin massacre. Wikipedia.

3. Sabra and Shatila massacre. Wikipedia.

4. Times of India. (2026, January 16). $180bn and counting: Why US arms Israel like no other.

5. New Age. (2026, June 16). Israel is shutting down its human laboratory in Gaza.

6. Anadolu Ajansı. (2026, February 17). ‘You test your weapons in Gaza’: Israeli protesters confront arms expo.

7. BMJ Global Health. (2026, March 23). Structural adjustment: damages, reparations and pathways to non-recurrence.

8. UNFPA. (2026, April 18). Gaza: A profound mental health emergency for children and young people.

The Politics of Protection – How the ADL and its Allies Weaponize Antisemitism to Defend Power

Posted on by
Reply

Dedicated to my wife — who taught me that real protection is never a weapon.

By Andrew Klein

I. Introduction: An Organisation at War with Its Own Mission

Founded in 1913, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) once sought to portray itself as a defender of civil rights. Its stated mission was “to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all”.

Yet a groundbreaking new history by Emmaia Gelman, The Anti-Defamation League and the Racial State, exposes a different reality. The ADL, Gelman argues, was born of the belief that “the best protection from antisemitism was admission into the white racial state and waging a vigorous defence of capitalism, individual rights, and the West”. Rather than dismantling systems of oppression, the ADL has pursued a century-long alliance with “American white supremacy and western empire”.

This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a matter of public record — and the implications for Australia are profound.

II. The ADL’s Historical Alliance with Power

From Labour Organisers to Neoconservatism

The ADL was founded in part to “quash the progressive impulses of labour organisers from Eastern Europe”. Its agenda has never been about protecting the vulnerable, but about policing the leftist politics of Black, Arab, and Jewish groups while pursuing “a conservative version of civil rights paired with aggressive anti-communism”.

Even as it became an authority on white nationalism in the 1970s, the ADL “joined with the emerging anti-left, anti-Arab, and pro-Western neoconservative movement“. This history has shaped its present-day work, from developing the “hate crimes framework as a pro-state policing project” to merging with the “War on Terror” and anti-Palestinian racism.

The Progressive Image as a Facade

The ADL’s progressive image is a facade. It has been described as “a deeply reactionary and conservative force in American politics”. Scholar Emmaia Gelman presents the ADL as working “to bolster capitalism, colonialism, and imperialism” — positions that have “won them a place in the halls of power, from the World Economic Forum to the White House”.

III. A Shield for Israel, a Sword Against Critics

Silencing Dissent on Campus

During the Gaza genocide, the ADL has abandoned any pretence of civil rights advocacy. As a Los Angeles Times opinion piece noted: “Founded in 1913 to combat anti-Jewish bigotry, the ADL was once respected for its civil-rights work. Now, amid nationwide protests over what the UN special rapporteur and others have called Israel’s genocide in Gaza, it’s shredding that reputation with reckless and unsupported accusations of antisemitism”.

The ADL has:

· Encouraged universities to weaponise antiterrorism laws to silence pro-Palestinian groups like Students for Justice in Palestine

· Filed complaints against colleges for “permitting severe discrimination” against Jewish students, effectively equating peaceful protest with harassment

· Lobbied for a congressional resolution defining anti-Zionism as antisemitism

· Called on law enforcement to investigate student activist groups for providing “material support” to Hamas

The Conflation Strategy

The ADL contends that “vilification of Zionism is a form of antisemitism“. Yet critics note that “many Jews are themselves critics of Zionism and of the ADL itself”. As one analysis observes, “The ADL and their allies also deem speech supporting Palestinian human rights to be coded antisemitism”.

Even ADL staff have protested. After CEO Jonathan Greenblatt placed “anti-Zionism” on a par with white supremacy, a senior manager at the ADL’s Center on Extremism wrote: “There is no comparison between white supremacists and insurrectionists and those who espouse anti-Israel rhetoric, and to suggest otherwise is both intellectually dishonest and damaging to our reputation as experts in extremism“. At least two employees have quit in response to the organisation’s overt emphasis on pro-Israel advocacy.

Defamation by Data

The ADL has been accused of “corrupting its widely cited hate crime data” by “putting Jewish peace rallies in the same category as antisemitic attacks”. Wikipedia’s editors have warned that the ADL “has repeatedly published false and misleading statements” on “topics of antisemitism and the Israel/Palestine conflict”. The Wall Street Journal has acknowledged that the ADL “has been challenged for counting criticism of Israel as antisemitism”.

IV. The ADL’s Reach into Australia

The J7 Task Force

The ADL does not operate in isolation. It coordinates a global network of pro-Israel advocacy groups. The J7 Task Force — “a group composed of the representative bodies of the 7 largest Jewish communities” — is “an initiative of the US-based Anti-Defamation League (ADL) who co-ordinate meetings and approach and was set up in mid-2023″. These biweekly Zoom meetings allow participants to “share tips, draft legislation and advance agendas”.

This is not a grassroots movement. This is co-ordinated political lobbying across national boundaries.

AIJAC, ZFA, and the Australian Lobby

In Australia, the ADL’s counterparts include the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) and the Zionist Federation of Australia (ZFA). These organisations have called for a Royal Commission into Antisemitism. But as critics note, they “actively monitor criticism of Israel and react quickly”, and their advocacy “conf lates criticism of Israel with antisemitism”.

The pro-Israel lobby in Australia has been remarkably effective. As Louise Adler wrote in The Guardian: “Collectively, with their News Ltd megaphone, they have successfully badgered the government of the day, cowed the ABC, intimidated vice-chancellors and threatened to defund arts organisations“.

V. The Special Envoy: The Local Face of a Global Network

Jillian Segal AO, Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, is the local manifestation of this international network.

A Conflict of Interest from the Start

Segal’s previous position as president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) — “an unequivocal advocate for Israel as the Jewish homeland” — “should have disqualified her for the role”. She is described as “part of the Combat Anti-Semitism movement” and “just as well connected with the international Zionist scene”.

A Record of Bias

Segal has “criticised calls for ceasefire in Gaza and defended the campaign of bombing hospitals”. Her plan has been described as containing “recommendations that will lead to erosion of freedom of expression and the right to protest”. Anti-Zionist Jewish groups have correctly stated that “Segal’s proposals have nothing to do with combating antisemitism, but will stoke racism and division“.

The Weaponisation of Antisemitism

The Special Envoy’s plan has been described as “the latest push to weaponize antisemitism in Australia“. As one critic noted: “The trope holds that Segal’s plan to combat antisemitism amounts to a wealthy minority stifling political dissent so that the Jewish state can evade the consequences of its ongoing ‘genocide’ in Gaza”.

VI. The Jewish Community: A False Monolith

The ADL and its allies do not speak for all Jews. Indeed, they have actively targeted Jewish groups that dissent.

Attacking Jewish Peace Activists

The ADL has accused Jewish Voice for Peace, a large anti-Zionist Jewish group, of “promot[ing] messaging” that can include “support for terrorists“. It has dismissed Jewish peace activists as belonging to “far-left radical organisations [who] do not represent the overwhelming majority of the Jewish community”.

The Jewish Council of Australia

In Australia, the Jewish Council of Australia — an anti-Zionist organisation formed in 2024 — “openly reject[s] the positions taken by mainstream Jewish communal organisations, particularly on Zionism, Israel and anti-Semitism”. Yet it is the mainstream organisations, not the dissenting voices, that have the ear of government.

VII. The NEA Vote: A Rejection of the ADL

In July 2025, the National Education Association (NEA) — the largest teachers’ union in the United States — voted to sever ties with the ADL. The union will “no longer cite the ADL’s data, promote its educational tools or partner on anti-bias training”.

The reasons cited included:

· The ADL’s “support for Israel’s war on Gaza“

· The ADL’s “inflation of hate crime statistics regarding Jewish safety“

· The ADL’s “demonisation of Palestinian human rights advocacy groups“

· The ADL’s opposition to “historically pro-Palestine movements, including Black Lives Matter and Indigenous rights groups”

This was not an isolated rebuke. Wikipedia editors have also voted that the ADL is “generally unreliable” on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

VIII. The Human Cost

The ADL’s campaign has real consequences. Civil rights groups and Jewish anti-Zionist organisations have “repeatedly criticised the ADL for using its influence to allegedly promote a pro-Israel agenda under the guise of civil rights“. Protests outside ADL offices have become frequent, with activists calling the organisation “complicit” in Israeli violations of international law.

Meanwhile, the censorship of pro-Palestinian voices continues. The ADL’s complaints have been “used to justify disciplinary measures against students critical of the deadly campaign that has already killed over 57,575 Palestinians and wounded at least 136,879 others”.

IX. Conclusion: The Weapon, Not the Shield

The ADL is not a civil rights organisation. It is a political organisation that has used the shield of fighting antisemitism to protect the state of Israel, silence its critics, and bolster the power of economic elites.

Its history reveals an institution “deeply entangled with the forces of empire, white supremacy, and capitalist exploitation”. Its present actions reveal an organisation willing to defame, silence, and punish those who speak out against genocide.

In Australia, the same pattern is visible. An unelected envoy with a history of pro-Israel advocacy has been given the power to shape policy on antisemitism — a policy that conflates legitimate criticism of Israel with bigotry, and that threatens to silence healthcare workers, academics, and activists who dare to speak the truth.

The Jewish community has a proud history of advocating for human rights and workers’ rights. The ADL and its allies do not represent that tradition. They represent something else entirely: the weaponisation of identity to defend power.

And that is not protection. That is politics.

Andrew Klein

Dedicated to my wife — who taught me that real protection is never a weapon.

References

1. Gelman, E. (2026). The Anti-Defamation League and the Racial State. University of California Press.

2. Gelman, E. (2026). The Anti-Defamation League Was Never Progressive — It Was Never Meant To Be. Religion Dispatches.

3. Dery, M. (2024, July 16). What’s behind the Anti-Defamation League’s troubling complaints against L.A.-area colleges. Los Angeles Times.

4. How the Pro-Israel Lobby Is Organised: From Global Hubs to Australia. (2026, January 17). Sleekit Scotsman.

5. US largest teachers union cuts ties with pro-Israel Anti-Defamation League. (2025, July 9). The New Arab.

6. Adler, L. (2025, July 12). The special envoy’s plan is the latest push to weaponise antisemitism in Australia. The Guardian.

7. Anti-Defamation League staff decry ‘dishonest’ campaign against Israel critics. (2024, January 5). The Guardian.

8. FAIR. (2025, February 19). ADL’s Stats Twist Israel’s Critics Into Antisemites.

9. The Guardian. (2025, April 26). Conservatives fighting ‘antisemitism’ are actively targeting US Jews.

10. Haaretz. (2025, July 23). Why a plan to combat rising antisemitism is dividing Jews in Australia.

11. Green Left. (2026, January 19). Policy on antisemitism must not help embed Zionism.

P.S. — The weapon is not the shield. And the truth cannot be silenced. 

The Weaponisation of Antisemitism – How an Unelected Envoy and a Contested Definition Are Silencing Healthcare Workers

Posted on by
Reply

Dedicated to healthcare workers around the world who take a stand against genocide.

By Andrew Klein

I. Introduction: A Dangerous Precedent

On 17 June 2026, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) announced it had adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism to guide its regulatory work. Ahpra CEO Justin Untersteiner stated the agency is “committed to working with the Special Envoy for Antisemitism and partners to eliminate antisemitism from the health system”.

This announcement represents a significant and deeply concerning expansion of regulatory power. The IHRA definition is contested worldwide—seven of its eleven illustrative examples concern Israel, raising legitimate fears that it conflates criticism of Israeli policy with antisemitism. The Australia Palestine Advocacy Network (APAN) has warned that the move could “silence health professionals from criticising Israel’s human rights record”.

This paper examines the influence of the antisemitism envoy, the lack of evidence for antisemitism in the healthcare system, the powers of Ahpra, and the broader pattern of Zionist influence over Australian institutions.

II. The Special Envoy: Power Without Accountability

Jillian Segal AO was appointed as Australia’s first Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism in July 2024. Her role is to “assist and advise Government” by providing advice to the Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs and promoting public awareness of antisemitism.

She has no legislative power to compel any institution to do anything. Her role is advisory.

Yet Segal has demanded sweeping legal and institutional changes that were never debated in Parliament. As one commentator noted, “This isn’t policy, it’s a Kafkaesque nightmare”. Her recommendations include:

· Stripping funding from universities that fail to act on antisemitism

· New hate speech laws criminalising promotion of racial hatred

· Expanded powers to cancel visas

· New rules to address online hate

The irony is stark: Australians were asked to vote on same-sex marriage and the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, but on the question of whether speech critical of a foreign state should be criminalised, “we are not asked. There is no referendum, no transparency and no democratic process”.

III. The IHRA Definition: A Contested and Weaponised Tool

The IHRA definition states: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews”. The controversy lies in its illustrative examples—seven of eleven relate to Israel.

The definition has been condemned by its own author. Kenneth Stern, the lead drafter of the IHRA definition, has become one of its most vocal critics, calling its application “a disaster” for democracy and likening the current climate to McCarthyism. When ABC Radio put this criticism to Segal, she dismissed it: “That train has moved on… and Kenneth Stern has been left behind”.

The Australian Parliament has received numerous submissions highlighting the definition’s dangers. One submission notes that the IHRA definition “dangerously conflates criticism of Israel with antisemitism” and “promotes a dangerous ‘Israel Exceptionalism‘, granting the state undue immunity from accountability for heinous crimes“. The submission further notes that the International Court of Justice has found South Africa’s claim that Israel is violating the Genocide Convention “plausible” and declared Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories “unlawful”.

IV. The Evidence: What Antisemitism in Healthcare?

Ahpra’s adoption of the IHRA definition implies a significant problem with antisemitism in the Australian healthcare system. The evidence suggests otherwise.

According to Ahpra’s own testimony before a Senate committee, of 225 complaints accusing health practitioners of antisemitism or Islamophobia since October 2023, approximately 200 were closed with no regulatory action. Only 13 complaints resulted in regulatory action, including three tribunal referrals.

Most complaints were about health workers posting on social media—not about their practice. This suggests the problem is not widespread antisemitism in healthcare, but rather the weaponisation of the complaints process to silence political expression.

As APAN noted, healthcare workers have reported “fear of professional consequences for speaking publicly about Gaza and Palestine“. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners has raised concerns about “frivolous or vexatious complaints” to the health regulator about social media posts opposing Israel’s war in Gaza.

V. Ahpra’s Powers: An Odious Overreach?

Ahpra is Australia’s health practitioner regulator, responsible for ensuring practitioners are “qualified, competent, and safe to practice”. It has significant powers, including:

· Issuing public statements about practitioners under investigation

· Imposing sanctions before wrongdoing is confirmed in cases of “serious risk to public safety”

· Issuing interim prohibition orders against unregistered persons

The question is whether Ahpra should be using these powers to police political speech. The answer is clear: no.

Ahpra’s role is to protect public safety—not to enforce political orthodoxy. Using a contested, weaponised definition of antisemitism to investigate healthcare workers for their political views is an odious overreach that threatens:

· Freedom of speech—healthcare workers should be able to speak out against genocide without fear of professional consequences

· Medical ethics—doctors have a duty to speak out against violations of medical neutrality and attacks on healthcare

· The integrity of the complaints process—the weaponisation of complaints undermines trust in the regulator

Untersteiner acknowledged concerns about the “weaponisation of the notifications process” and stated Ahpra is reviewing its vexatious notifications framework. This is insufficient. The adoption of the IHRA definition itself is an act of weaponisation.

VI. The International Context: BMA and the Israeli Medical Association

While Ahpra is adopting the IHRA definition to police political speech, the British Medical Association (BMA) has taken a different path. In July 2025, the BMA voted to suspend engagement with the Israeli Medical Association (IMA) until it “affirms medical neutrality and condemns attacks on healthcare in Gaza”.

The IMA has described attempts to suspend it from the World Medical Association as “setting an extremely dangerous precedent”. The WMA itself has opposed the initiative.

The contrast is instructive. The BMA is taking a stand against the IMA’s failure to uphold medical neutrality. Ahpra, by contrast, is taking a stand against healthcare workers who criticise Israel’s actions. One is a stand for medical ethics. The other is a stand for political conformity.

VII. The Geopolitical Context: Genocide and Complicity

The adoption of the IHRA definition must be understood in the context of Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza and Lebanon. Health officials have reported that Israel’s war on Gaza has killed more than 73,000 Palestinians, including thousands of healthcare workers.

Ahpra’s move comes at a time when the Australian government is investigating the treatment of Australians who were part of a humanitarian flotilla intercepted by the IDF. This appears to be “string pulling and the pre-emptive victim theatrics so beloved of the Zionist political movement“—short on facts, it makes up with noise and threats to personal standing and income streams.

The Australian government has already legislated sweeping hate speech laws following the Bondi terror attack, which killed 15 people at a Hanukkah event. These laws grant powers to list “hate groups” and cancel visas. ASIO chief Mike Burgess conceded the laws would likely see such groups “simply move underground”.

VIII. Conclusion: A Choice Between Democracy and Censorship

The adoption of the IHRA definition by Ahpra represents a dangerous precedent. An unelected envoy, with no legislative power, has pressured a regulatory agency to adopt a contested definition that has been condemned by its own author. The evidence for antisemitism in healthcare is thin, and the definition itself is a weapon to silence political speech.

Healthcare workers should be able to speak out against genocide without fear of professional consequences. Medical ethics demand nothing less. The weaponisation of antisemitism to silence critics of Israel is not just an attack on free speech—it is an attack on the integrity of the medical profession itself.

The Australian government is currently investigating the treatment of Australians who were part of a humanitarian flotilla intercepted by the IDF. This investigation must proceed without prejudice, and the findings must be made public. The adoption of a contested definition of antisemitism by a health regulator should not be used to pre-emptively discredit the findings.

Australia’s healthcare system must be a place of healing, not a place of political policing. The use of a weaponised definition of antisemitism to silence healthcare workers must be rejected.

Andrew Klein

Dedicated to healthcare workers around the world who take a stand against genocide.

References

1. Ahpra. (2026, June 17). Eliminating antisemitism in healthcare. Joint statement with Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism. 

2. Iran slams Australia for targeting doctors criticizing Israel’s war crimes in Gaza, Lebanon. Press TV. (2026, June 20). 

3. Ore, A. (2026, June 20). Fears doctors criticising Israel may be silenced as health watchdog adopts contested antisemitism definition. Guardian Australia / NewsBreak. 

4. ABC News. (2026, January 21). New hate laws have passed parliament. What do they actually do? 

5. Pearls and Irritations. (2025, July 18). Antisemitism, free speech and a dangerous redefinition: How one envoy is rewriting the rules. 

6. AusDoc. (2026, February 17). 201 complaints to AHPRA about anti-Semitism or Islamophobia closed without sanctions.

7. Submission to Senate Inquiry into Antisemitism at Australian Universities. (2024). Parliament of Australia. 

8. Australian Government. (2025, December 18). Special Envoy’s Plan to Combat Antisemitism. Joint media release. 

9. Australian Government. (2025). Terms of Reference: Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism. 

10. The Guardian. (2025, July 10). Australian envoy’s antisemitism plan criticised as ‘Trumpian’ over concerns changes could be used to silence dissent. 

11. ABC News. (2025, July 10). Antisemitism plan would strip funding from unis, arts events who fail to fight Jewish hate. 

12. The New Arab. (2025, July 4). UK doctors call on BMA to cut ties with Israeli medics over Gaza. 

13. Ynetnews. (2025, July 3). British Medical Association members call to suspend ties with Israel over Gaza war. 

14. Jewish News. (2026, June 15). World Medical Association condemns attempt to suspend Israeli Medical Association. 

P.S. — Healthcare workers who take a stand against genocide deserve protection, not persecution. 

The Reanimation of the Dead – How US Medical Institutions Are Enabling Military Extraction

Posted on by
Reply

” The dead cannot speak. But the living can witness. Do not look away.”

By Andrew Klein

Dedication: To my wife – who taught me that anger without clarity is noise, but anger with witness is truth.

I. Introduction: The Quiet Horror

In May 2026, an investigation by the AJ+ documentary series Direct From revealed a story so disturbing that it has been largely buried by mainstream media. The University of Southern California (USC) and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) — two of America ‘s most prestigious academic institutions — have been selling donated human bodies to the United States Navy for combat medical training involving Israeli military surgical teams .

Since 2018, USC has supplied at least 89 “fresh cadavers” under contracts with the US Navy. Of these, at least 32 were used specifically to train Israeli military surgical teams at the Navy Trauma Training Centre in Los Angeles General Medical Centre. The Navy has paid USC over $860,000 for these bodies, with at least one contract still ongoing as of October 2025 and a notice of intent to renew until at least 2029.

The bodies came from people who donated themselves to science — often with the belief that they were contributing to medical education and research, not to military training for a foreign army engaged in a genocide. Donor documents did not indicate that the cadavers would be used for military training, either for the US or Israel. Families were not informed.

This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a contract.

This article examines the cadaver trade, the torture and abuse of Palestinian detainees, the treatment of wounded Palestinians by Israeli forces, and the broader moral collapse of a state that has turned medicine into a weapon. The evidence is overwhelming. The silence is damning. And the extraction — the logic that treats human beings as resources — does not end with death.

II. The Reanimation of the Dead

The training program is not theoretical. A 2020 medical paper co‑authored by USC and US Navy instructors describes a four‑day “combat trauma surgery skills course” tailored specifically for Israeli military forward surgical teams — units that operate close to the front lines.

During the training, the cadavers are “reanimated” using a process called perfusion: artificial blood is pumped through the body to simulate active, lifelike bleeding on the battlefield. Trainees practice emergency interventions on simulated combat injuries, including:

· Gunshot wounds to the chest and limbs

· Blast injuries to the face and torso from improvised explosive devices (IEDs)

This is not standard medical education. Several trauma surgeons interviewed for the AJ+ documentary emphasised that using perfused cadavers is an exceptionally rare practice, restricted to specialised military exercises.

The US Navy defended the arrangement, stating that experienced trauma surgeons “recreate complex injury patterns with surgical tools to deliver a high‑fidelity, hyper‑realistic training environment”. USC has declined repeated requests to detail the exact methods used to simulate these battlefield wounds.

For the families of donors, the betrayal is profound. Miriam Volpin’s mother, Jeanette Volpin, a 101‑year‑old World War II flight nurse, donated her body to USC. When Miriam learned about the IDF training programme, she said: “I was furious and sick to my stomach”. Her granddaughter, Sarah, added that she believes her grandmother would not have donated her body had she known it might be used in military training.

Jennifer Gomez’s grandmother, Jean McNeil Sargeant, donated her body to UCSD in 2012. Gomez told AJ+: “I didn ‘t realise that there would be international militaries coming here, training on our family’s bodies. Especially one that’s been accused of war crimes and is actively killing people”.

At least two people have revoked their body donations after learning of the programme. Wendy Smith, an English professor, said: “I would really not like to support anything that Israel is doing right now”.

This is not medicine. It is logistics.

III. The Torture of the Living

The same week the cadaver story broke, The BMJ published a comprehensive review of torture and health worker complicity in Israeli detention sites. The evidence is staggering.

At least 98 Palestinians have died in Israeli custody since October 2023 — at least 46 in Israel Prison Service facilities and 52, all from Gaza, in military custody. A report by Physicians for Human Rights Israel, entitled “Death Sentence for Palestinians in Custody,” described the toll as unprecedented and said the actual figure may be higher.

PHRI said initial post‑mortem findings pointed to a pattern of severe abuse, including head injuries, internal bleeding, and broken ribs, as well as extreme malnutrition and denial of lifesaving care. The report called for an independent international investigation.

The documentation of torture is not new. The BMJ review notes that torture by Israeli soldiers and health workers has been “extensively documented over several decades by United Nations independent experts, and many human rights organisations including the United Against Torture Coalition, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and B‘Tselem”. By the Israeli government’s own admission, torture has been used “systematically” against Palestinian people.

Depraved acts include extreme physical, psychological, and sexual violence, the denial of medical care, sleep deprivation, the use of prolonged solitary confinement, attacks by dogs under the control of their handlers, being urinated on, and prolonged shackling of limbs — in some cases causing injuries requiring amputation.

After the barbaric incident in July 2024 in which nine Israeli soldiers were arrested for the torture and sexual assault of a Palestinian man — leaving him with ruptured intestines, broken ribs, and lung trauma — elected members of the Israeli Knesset joined protests in support of the soldiers. A survey by the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies found that 65% of Israeli Jews believed the arrested soldiers should not face criminal charges.

The Israeli lawyer Yifat Tomer‑Yerushalmi who leaked footage of the attack has since been arrested for doing so, with the government accusing her of “damaging Israel ‘s global standing”.

This is not a failure of individual soldiers. It is a culture.

IV. Medical Complicity: The Betrayal of the Healer

Particularly troubling is the long‑standing and well‑documented complicity of Israeli health workers in torture. The BMJ review states: “Recent survivors of detention have reported that Israeli health workers have been physically violent towards detainees, knowingly denied medical treatment, and neglected detainees‘injuries”.

Israeli whistleblowers have reported that detainees at the Sde Teiman detention site were denied analgesia during painful procedures, while doctors working at the site were told not to write their names on official documents — with one doctor revealing that “officials feared they could be identified and charged with war crimes”. Others reported they lacked the training for treatments and procedures they were made to administer.

An Israeli Ministry of Health policy document reviewed by the New York Times explicitly stated that detainees treated at the Sde Teiman field hospital should be blindfolded and handcuffed to their beds.

Physicians for Human Rights Israel produced a report concluding that “conditions and the medical care standards at Sde Teiman are a low point for medical ethics and professionalism” and “that the Israeli healthcare system has enabled the ethical violations previously outlined concerning the medical treatment of Gazan detainees”.

The Israeli Medical Association has failed to investigate allegations of complicity among its members. The BMJ authors argue that “the WMA and many national medical associations have failed to act in a timely and decisive manner on growing evidence of torture and medical complicity, which now spans several decades”.

This is not medicine. It is complicity.

V. The Targeting of Palestinian Healthcare Workers

The total number of Palestinians held in Israeli prisons and detention sites exceeded 9,100 as of October 2025. Detailed reporting from Healthcare Workers Watch Palestine identified 405 cases of unlawful detention of Palestinian healthcare workers since October 2023. At least five Palestinian healthcare workers are known to have been killed in Israeli detention in the same period.

Among those killed was Adnan al‑Bursh, a respected orthopaedic surgeon who was illegally detained by Israeli forces in December 2023. He was held without charge and died in prison in April 2024 after severe mistreatment.

As of October 2025, at least 95 Palestinian healthcare workers remained in detention, including Hussam Abu Safiyeh, paediatrician and director of Kamal Adwan Hospital, who was abducted and unlawfully detained in December 2024.

These are not isolated incidents. The BMJ review notes that they must be understood in relation to evidence that suggests a broader strategy of targeting healthcare professionals, aimed at “undermining the Palestinian healthcare system and maximising harm inflicted against the Palestinian people”. This strategy extends to the killing of more than 1,700 Palestinian healthcare workers in Gaza since October 2023, and clearly documented patterns of systematic and targeted destruction of healthcare infrastructure, including hospitals, clinics, ambulances, and essential medical equipment.

These acts constitute clear violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention, intended to protect medical personnel during armed conflict.

VI. The Victims of the Training

The BMJ review notes that the training Israeli military surgeons receive — including on perfused cadavers — is applied on the battlefields of Gaza. Israeli military doctors and surgeons have embedded with brigades on the front lines since 2023.

The very skills practiced on the bodies of Americans who thought they were donating to science are now being used to treat the wounds of Israeli soldiers — and, by extension, to enable the continuation of the genocide.

But what of the wounded Palestinians?

Under the Geneva Conventions, occupying powers are required to provide medical care to the wounded and sick of the occupied population. Yet evidence suggests systematic denial. Detainees are denied medical treatment. Hospitals are bombed. Ambulances are targeted. Healthcare workers are killed in detention.

A report by Physicians for Human Rights Israel called for an investigation into the denial of lifesaving care to Palestinian detainees. The BMJ review documents that survivors have repeatedly reported being denied medical treatment for their injuries.

The contrast could not be starker.

In Los Angeles, cadavers are perfused with artificial blood to simulate combat injuries for Israeli surgeons. In Gaza, real blood flows in the streets, and real surgeons are killed.

VII. The Sale of Stolen Land

The same week the cadaver story broke, occupation authorities issued a tender for 3,401 settlement units in the area designated as E1, east of occupied Jerusalem — a measure that would cut off Palestinian access to East Jerusalem and which senior officials declared was intended to “bury the idea of a Palestinian state” once and for all .

This is not a secret. It is a campaign.

The sale of stolen Palestinian land is not new. Israeli real estate companies actively advertise properties in illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank — including Gush Etzion and Ma ‘ale Adumim — at exhibitions in London, Montreal, and New York. Under international law, all Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal. The Fourth Geneva Convention explicitly prohibits an occupying power from transferring parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

The same logic that captures bodies captures land. The same logic that permits the extraction of organs permits the extraction of territory. The same logic that enables the sale of cadavers enables the sale of stolen homes.

Extraction is not a crime against humanity. It is a business model.

VIII. The Sexual Abuse Scandal and the Culture of Impunity

The sexual abuse of Palestinian detainees is not new. In July 2024, nine Israeli soldiers were arrested for the torture and sexual assault of a Palestinian man held in Israeli detention — leaving him with ruptured intestines, broken ribs, and lung trauma. As noted, elected members of the Knesset joined protests in support of the soldiers, and 65% of Israeli Jews believed they should not face criminal charges.

This is not an aberration. It is a pattern.

The Israeli military has long had a documented problem with sexual harassment and assault within its ranks. Whistleblowers are silenced. Perpetrators are protected. The whistleblower who exposed the Sde Teiman rape — Major General Yifat Tomer‑Yerushalmi, the Israeli military ‘s chief advocate — was not celebrated. She was arrested, charged with “obstructing justice,” and investigated for a suicide attempt. The perpetrators were protected. The truth‑teller was punished.

This is the institutionalisation of impunity. This is what happens when a society teaches its soldiers that violence against the “other” is permitted, even celebrated.

And the same culture that permits the sexual abuse of detainees permits the desecration of the dead. The same impunity that protects rapists protects the institutions that sell bodies to foreign militaries.

The cycle is closed. The extraction is complete.

IX. The Failure of International Law

The post‑WWII rules‑based international order was supposed to prevent this kind of extraction. The United Nations, the International Court of Justice, the Geneva Conventions — all were designed to create a framework in which might would not make right.

That order is now “under destruction,” as the 2026 Munich Security Report bluntly stated.

The International Court of Justice has recognised its prima facie jurisdiction to investigate Israel for carrying out genocide in Gaza. The ICJ‘s orders are ignored. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants. They are ignored. The UN Security Council is paralysed by the US veto.

The system does not work — not because it is inherently flawed, but because the powerful have refused to apply it equally.

The victims — Palestinian, Lebanese, Syrian — are not people. They are obstacles.

The Western response to Russia ‘s invasion of Ukraine — united, resolute, armed — stands in stark contrast to the response to Israel’s assault on Gaza. The double standard is glaring. And it is not unnoticed in the Global South.

The rules‑based order is not collapsing. It is being abandoned.

By the very powers that created it.

X. Conclusion: The Moral Collapse

The evidence is clear. The pattern is unmistakable.

· The bodies of Americans, donated in good faith to science, have been used to train the surgeons who patch up the soldiers who drop the bombs on Gaza.

· Palestinian detainees are tortured — sexually, physically, psychologically — by soldiers and health workers alike, with impunity and public support.

· Healthcare workers are targeted, detained, killed.

· Hospitals are bombed. Ambulances are destroyed.

· The wounded are denied care.

· The dead are desecrated — not in Gaza, in Los Angeles.

This is not a failure of individual morality. It is a systemic collapse.

The State of Israel is not a state in crisis. It is a state in moral collapse.

The same collapse that permits the sale of stolen land permits the sale of stolen bodies. The same collapse that permits the torture of detainees permits the desecration of the dead. The same collapse that permits the bombing of hospitals permits the training of surgeons on perfused cadavers.

The question is not whether the cycle can be broken. The question is whether we will choose to break it.

Not with violence — with clarity.

Andrew Klein

References

1. AJ+ / Al Jazeera. (2026, June 2). Direct From documentary: US university sells dead bodies to navy for Israeli military training.

2. Tribune Online. (2026, June 1). Israeli military, US Navy train medics on dead Americans — Report.

3. Press Telegram. (2025, October 3). USC sold dead bodies to Navy for Israel Defense Forces medical training program.

4. FOX 11 Los Angeles. (2025, October 2). USC sold cadavers to military for IDF training: report.

5. Al Jazeera. (2026, June 2). USC sold cadavers to US Navy for Israeli military training.

6. Al Jazeera. (2026, June 2). Iran war updates: Tehran ponders US deal; Lebanon-Israel talks under way.

7. el‑Solh, S., Smith, J., Nimerawi, A., & Gilbert, M. (2025). Torture and health worker complicity in Israeli detention sites. The BMJ, 391, r2347.

8. Physicians for Human Rights Israel. (2025). Death Sentence for Palestinians in Custody.

9. The Jerusalem Post. (2025, November 17). PHRI reports 98 Palestinian deaths in Israeli prisons.